Amy Harris, photographer pressing charges against OFWGKTA’s Left Brain for a physical altercation.
I have just a few thoughts on this, which is of course a really up in the air, facts unknown type of thing. But, dating and living with someone who gets death threats, and threats of violence and rape, has given me a little perspective, maybe. For one, this happens! Which is amazing to me. I had previously thought that things like getting emails threatening to rape or murder people simply didn’t happen.
Emails, comments, message board threads about such. Who does that? Did I pass out on my keyboard and accidentally log into MySpace?
But, well, say someone does that. They’re not actually going to do anything, right? They’re just kids or trolls. Well, maybe. However — do you really want to 1) place the onus of whether or not to be afraid of a threat back onto the threatened rather than put it on the threatener? (No.) And 2) believe that semi-random/semi-premeditated rage-induced violence does not happen? (It does.)
The thing about Odd Future is that it’s never been about the lyrics. Not in a vacuum. It’s about the way people relate to the lyrics in a social way. The way the lyrics fit into the historical conversation of racism and misogyny in America. Proponents of the group, the thoughtful ones, claim OF gives a good occasion to re-enter those conversations with a fresh, modern perspective. The more critical of us claim that OF’s fans and admirers shirk their duty to do that, thereby just reveling in violence, racism, and misogyny as a tourist’s hedonistic enterprise into brief depravity. (There’s also a historical conversation about ‘slumming it’, appropriating others’ culture, and dabbling in violence to ‘feel alive’ or, if you’re Hegel, ‘be a human being’.)
Now, OF’s publicist’s statement after the event, which says in part,
Vyron (Leftbrain) took a swipe at a few cameras, NOT people. To manipulate the situation to insinuate an attack on a woman specifically is careless and manipulative.
is itself manipulative. Honestly, no one is an apt target for violence, just like no one is a proper perpetrator of it. But the group has a problem with women. Its de facto leader has made numerous public statements to the effect that he gives no shits about women. So when a woman ends up getting assaulted at an OF show, even inadvertently, that’s still on them. The publicist sounds like Sarah Palin defending her gun sight imagery. Foolish. (via bmichael)
(via alexbaca)
-
1-mail-order-brides liked this
-
shakingthelawbythetail reblogged this from bmichael
-
asktheangels liked this
-
jonathanbogart liked this
-
thatluciegirl liked this
-
disharmonious liked this
-
heymikewaskom liked this
-
shorterexcerpts said:
And if they’re truly so anti-photography, why not ban all press passes from pit row, etc.? By not going 100%, it comes across as a manufactured pose so they can appear “edgy”.
-
shorterexcerpts liked this
-
shana--e liked this
-
theremixbaby liked this
-
doug liked this
-
whatfreshheckisthis liked this
-
thethirdshift liked this
-
youngmanhattanite liked this
-
baitandswitch liked this
-
nervousacid liked this
-
how-to-kiss-distinctly-american liked this
-
wooliebear liked this
-
perpetua said:
Dude, I have been sent SO MANY emails from photographers and PR people etc who insist this woman is lying, and it’s just so depressing to have all these guys come out in defense of fucking ODD FUTURE. Bums me out big time.
-
peachtreekeen liked this
-
bmichael posted this